Other people aren't just dumber clones of yourself

Other people aren't just dumber clones of yourself

By R’Kok

Channel: A. S. 

Received on June 14, 2024 by e-mail

 

 

 

 

My dear Earth friends,

I am happy that I can share a message with you once again.

Today I would like to discuss a trap that Earth people frequently fall into, and a trap that I have repeatedly fallen into.

The trap is assuming that anyone who disagrees with you, is automatically dumber than you are.

Or alternatively, that a person who disagrees with you is less informed than you are, or is less spiritually evolved than you are, or is morally inferior to you (they're virtue-signalling, or racist, et cetera).

This is really convenient for the ego, because it lets it maintain the self image that you're the smartest, or the most informed, or the most spiritually evolved, or the most morally upstanding person.

And you're certainly better than that person who disagrees with you, who is clearly dumber or less informed or less evolved or less moral than you are.

Your ego really likes feeling superior to others, and it likes thinking that your current worldview is correct and indeed is superior to the worldview of others.

But the problem, of course, is that sometimes a person who disagrees with you actually isn't dumber, or otherwise inferior to you.

In fact, it's a common ego defense to label smarter or better-informed or more evolved people than yourself as actually being inferior to yourself.

However, doing so means that you learn a lot less things than you could be learning, and you miss opportunities to dispel illusions and misconceptions you might have. And most likely you have those.

One example of this phenomenon is: imagine a person on the other political side. Notice how you're probably picturing someone who is likely inferior to you in some way. Even though there certainly are people on the other political side who are smarter than you, who are more well-read than you, who donate more money to charity than you, who spend more time doing volunteer work, et cetera.

That very thought, that some people on the other political side are superior to you in some way, may be vaguely uncomfortable to you.

Is that vaguely uncomfortable for you? I invite you to take a moment to feel your body.

That's the crux: your ego is trying to meet your surface-level needs, and immediate psychological well-being is one of them. Hence people's tendencies to assume that people who disagree with them are inferior to them.

Yes, this contributes to the resistance of sleepers to wake up.

But spiritual people do it too. A lot of spiritual people are implicitly assuming that people who disagree with them are just less spiritually evolved than them and therefore wrong. They don't say that out loud, but that's what a lot of spiritual people secretly think.

Or spiritual people might make self-serving rules that then "prove" that they're superior to others. For example, a vegan might think that anyone who isn't a vegan automatically isn't as spiritually advanced as them. (I'm not saying all vegans think like this, I'm saying some do.)

Or a dedicated yoga practitioner might think that anyone who isn't doing yoga or something similar automatically isn't as spiritually advanced as them.

Or someone might think that anyone who meditates less or does fewer spiritual retreats automatically isn't as spiritually advanced as them.

Or a person with a following might think that anyone who doesn't have at least as big a following as they do, automatically isn't as spiritually advanced as them.

Or a spiritual person might suppress and ignore everything that isn't happy, and share only the most happy and most spiritual moments on social media, and act in a stereotypically spiritual way. And then that person might think that anyone who isn't as good at performing spirituality as them automatically isn't as spiritually evolved as they are.

Even though actual spiritual masters aren't just someone who conforms really closely to the spiritual stereotype. Actual masters are typically non-standard in some way, or have some non-standard belief or beliefs.

So, how do we avoid this trap where people assume that everyone who has a different worldview than them, is inferior to them?

First of all, you are good enough already, even if someone else is smarter or more informed than you are. Smarter or better-informed or more spiritually advanced people than you existing doesn't somehow make you "not good enough."

In fact, the ability to open-mindedly listen to people with different perspectives, and to occasionally learn from people and change your mind, is a quality in and of itself. It's only the ego that thinks that never changing your opinion is somehow strong or good.

If we're talking about politics: don't only look at the dumbest and most extreme people on the other side. Yes that is egoically pleasing, but there are smart, well-informed, reasonable people on the other side too.

Yes, almost certainly there are uninformed and morally reprehensible people on the other political side who have very dumb reasons for being on that political side. But that doesn't mean that everyone on that political side is like that. Just because some people on the other political side are idiots or evil, doesn't mean that they're all like that.

Try to be fair. So don't just blindly accept any argument that supports your worldview, even if it may be unreliable or poorly argued, while being extremely critical about any argument that doesn't fit your worldview.

Similarly, don't just blindly accept any argument that makes you feel good, even if it may be unreliable or poorly argued, while being extremely critical about any argument that makes you feel bad.

And acknowledge that people are different, and it's not always the case that if only that other person was as smart or well-read or as spiritually advanced or as moral as you were, that they'd think exactly like you did.

People who disagree with you aren't just a dumber clone of yourself.

Instead, different people are actually different. Other people might genuinely think in different ways. They're not just exactly you, except dumber.

They're not just exactly you, except less spiritually evolved.

A mistake I made back in my selfish days was that I thought that psychopathic, cold-blooded, self-interested logic was all there was, and the rest was all just weakness and nonsense.

From my perspective, I could out-logic and out-debate literally anyone.

I disregarded everything that wasn't psychopathic logic as invalid, and then could win any discussion on my home turf. But of course, I was just looking through a very narrow lens.

I was just subjectively and even irrationally labeling the thing I like as being the one valid thing. But there was never any objective reason for why my thing actually was the only valid thing.

That's a bit of an extreme example, but different people put different weights on things like rationality versus emotions, on being kind versus speaking the truth, on the importance of safety versus freedom, et cetera. Different people are different.

If you value a certain thing very highly, then it might be easy to think that of course you're smarter and better informed than everyone else, because after all your worldview is the only one that sufficiently values that thing.

But this doesn't indicate that other people are dumber than you. It may just mean that other people have different values than you. And their values aren't automatically worse than your values.

Other people aren't just dumber clones of yourself.

Also, I would like to talk about one more thing that frankly irritates me, R'Kok, perhaps more than it should.

Many people love Tunia's messages, and are either fine with or actively enjoy that she occasionally talks about sex.

However, some readers, or listeners, have mentioned that Tunia talks excessively often about sex, after her message: "Tunia: What Pleiadians Are Like".

Obviously you're free to have that perspective, yet I would like to give my perspective as well.

I think that if you did a word count on all messages Tunia has ever put out (not just last week's message), you'd be surprised how few words Tunia actually spends talking about sex.

In most messages she doesn't mention sex at all. And in the others the sex talk either serves a larger purpose, or it's just jokes or stories on the side. However sex isn't the main point, nor is it most of the word count. It's not like she's writing the kama sutra here.

Although note that even in the much more pleasure-focused kama sutra, people have in their head that that book is just one sex position after the other. When in reality, the kama sutra isn't predominantly about sex positions.

I guess that if a spiritual book or person talks about sex, especially a woman, that's apparently so scandalous and sticks in the mind so clearly that people think that it's all or mostly about sex. Even though it's not.

Sex is an important part of life, so why would it be bad for sex to also be a part of her messages?

When Tunia jokes "After a century of being with him, I’m still working my husband’s penis like I’m a slave driver" then some people still remember that sentence almost two years later. But do people remember any other sentence from that seventeen-page message? Probably not.

[Channeler's note: Tunia interrupts me to communicate that that sentence was not, in fact, a joke. Now, back to R'Kok.]

And then you can wonder if it's the spiritual book or person that is weird about sex, or if it's the average Earth person or Earth society that is weird about sex.

Who determines what is excessive sex talk, after all? It's not like Tunia is hurting anyone, it's not like sex or human bodies are bad, and it's not like her being different from the norm is automatically bad.

So then, I say to those people who are a bit triggered by Tunia's sex talk: as always it's good to look inwards before you point the finger outwards.

Do you have "sex is shameful" or "bodies are bad" or "women aren't allowed to be openly horny" or "women must be modest" programming?

Or maybe you're in pain that most Pleiadians are having a great time while you're down on Earth? Which would be a completely understandable feeling, but if that's alive in you, then it's good to be aware of that and to observe it.

Or is sexuality something you judge in yourself, or are you unhappy about your own sex life? Again, I empathize, but if so it would be good to observe it.

Personally, when I left my selfish days behind me and I left my fellow reptilians and joined the Pleiadians, I was very repressed and angry and ashamed and stuck in my head.

For me, it required a Pleiadian woman, who was just consistently and authentically herself, to eventually help me break out of my own shell and out of my own head and out of my own prison of mental constructs and illusions and nonsense.

I called her a bitch a few times, because she triggered me, but really she was just being herself and wasn't hurting anyone. Well, she was hurting me, but then again she really wasn't.

I've since apologized to her.

She was alive for me to apologize to her, but she chose to pass on before I was able to actually get over my own nonsense enough to realize that I appreciated her, that I cared for her, and that her authentic weirdness had inspired me and had taught me a great deal.

It is one of the regrets in my life that I wasn't able to get over my own nonsense in time for me to be able to express to her that she actually meant a lot to me. That she was more to me than "well, you're not a bitch. Sorry."

Those were the last words of any substance that I ever said to her. I exchanged a few words with her a couple of times after that, but I didn't say anything meaningful those times. Pathetic.

Maybe I'm projecting, but maybe Tunia, or some other Pleiadian woman, can be the authentic teacher who helps you get over some of your nonsense. Not by any particular technique of hers, but just by her being her own authentic weird self. And sometimes maybe by triggering the heck out of you.

Good. Get triggered.

Get triggered to hell and back.

Get triggered until your castle of nonsense collapses in on itself.

And I pray that when your castle of nonsense finally collapses, and you finally get over yourself, that woman will still be alive for you to be able to express to her just how much she means to you.

I'm projecting, I'm triggered, and I'm crying.

Uh, end of message.

A. S. 

For Era of Light

These channelings are exclusively submitted to Eraoflight.com by the channeler. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to the original post.

If you are interested in local meetings with other people also seeking first contact with benevolent ETs, then please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/ . If you search with control-F for @, then you can quickly find email addresses of those who are organizing local groups. It’s also not too late to post a new (secondary) email address yourself to start a new local group, because we plan to keep linking to that post for the foreseeable future.

---

 

Compiled by http://violetflame.biz.ly from: 

• channelings@substack.com

 

Archives:

• A. S.,   R’Kok,   search,   meaning,   
• lev,   quantum transition,   
• 3d 4d 5d,   betrayal,   christs creation,   co-creators,   dark and gray races,   karma, malice,   pleroma,    collaboration,    higher self,    blueprint,    new earth, operation adonai,  R’Kok,  

Society thrives if women love, and men provide and protect

Society thrives if women love, and men provide and protect

By R’Kok

Channel: A. S. 

Received on October 4, 2024 by e-mail

 

 

 

 

My dearest Earth brothers and sisters,

This is R'Kok speaking. I greet you in peace and love.

Society is very complex, and people are different from one another. Still, I feel that there exists a basic pattern that is generally true and that is really important to the well-being of society, and to the men and women therein.

Namely: society thrives if men protect and provide for everyone, and if women love everyone and express that. 

Now obviously people shouldn't be forced into these roles. However if men and women are healthy, enough of them will naturally feel drawn to these roles that society thrives.

Note that currently both Earth men and Earth women are very far from that ideal.

The average man isn't even close to thinking in terms of: "what can I do to make sure that every single person on this planet is protected and provided for." Which is actually what men do in a healthy society. Or at the very least, in a healthy society men work towards making sure that the people in their local community are protected and provided for.

To be clear, I don't mean that men should start pushing for more governmental welfare programs and correspondingly heavier taxation. More of that isn't the solution. Heavier taxation is basically signing up other people for charity or volunteer work, except that the government might very well not use that money productively. Rather than forcing other people to get signed up for charity or volunteer work via governmental taxation, I suggest signing yourself up to go do something tangible and useful in your local community.

After all, the saying is: be the change you want to see in the world. The saying isn't: use the power of the state to force other people to be the change you want to see in the world.

Although if you don't have the time or energy or health to go do some volunteer work or to start some local initiative, I understand and I empathize. Indeed, go put on your own air mask first, that is entirely valid. I know that people are struggling and that things are really tough out there, and I'm sorry.

Still: men aren't even close to thinking in terms of: "what can I do to make sure that people in my local community are protected and provided for."

Similarly, the average woman on Earth isn't even close to loving everyone and expressing that. Note that I'm saying loving everyone -- not just loving the people whom she agrees with politically, not just loving accomplished and likeable people. I'm talking about loving everyone and expressing that, including loving so-called "bad people."

The experience of an average man, who hasn't done anything wrong but also isn't especially handsome or famous, is that most women are at best neutral towards him, rather than loving. And often, women are cold and indifferent and perhaps even hostile towards him or towards male preferences and interests.

Some women might think "it's not our job to love random guys" but that's precisely why your society sucks. If women think that it's not their job to love random guys, and men think that it's not their job to protect or provide for random women, then neither men nor women get what they need to thrive.

At the very least, let's agree to end anti-male discrimination.

There's anti-male discrimination when it comes to hiring, divorce court, criminal court and police. There's constant negative representation of men in movies. Radical feminists often shut down male shelters. There are more female-only university scholarships at a time when already more women attend university. There's far more money for breast cancer than for prostate cancer research. Men expressing typical male viewpoints get censored or arrested far more often than women expressing typical female viewpoints.

Now obviously it's only a small group of women who push for these measures. Yet, the majority of women don't lift a finger to oppose these measures. The amount of women marching in the streets to end anti-male discrimination is practically zero.

As a result, perfectly fine men, who haven't actually done anything wrong other than being born with a penis, usually aren't feeling love from women. More like the opposite. And so they often just withdraw and start focusing on things like video games.

And yes, men who prove themselves in some positive way often are respected and loved by women. However people don't do well if they're treated as suspicious until proven innocent, and are only then given conditional love.

So: Earth men aren't doing what men need to be doing to help society thrive, and Earth women aren't doing what women need to be doing to help society thrive.

And unfortunately, these two things reinforce each other.

An average man probably experiences harshness and coldness or at best indifference from women as a group and from society. Likely he has a huge hole in his chest that is supposed to be filled by female love -- partly from his mother and his partner, but also partly just from women collectively being loving towards men collectively. 

Such a man is unlikely to want to take care of his whole community. At best he'll work to take care of his family, which is admirable in a way but not sufficient to cause society to thrive. And it's also entirely possible that an unloved man becomes selfish and destructive, or just indulges in distractions and addictions.

Conversely, it's entirely understandable for women who feel unsafe and materially insecure to not feel much love for average men. Because indeed, men as a group should be helping protect and provide for her, and they're failing at that. In fact, many women automatically harden up and become less feminine and more masculine if men aren't protecting her and providing for her, at least to an extent.

So: men don't feel the need to do their responsibility until women do theirs, and women don't feel the need to do their responsibility until men do theirs. So neither men nor women take responsibility, and neither gender gets what it needs.

Now, there's an idea among some women that men suck and that women should start ruling the world and then everything would be fine.

There have already been a number of prominent female politicians, including heads of state of important Western countries such as Thatcher and Merkel. Note that they were just another politician. They didn't transform their countries into utopias.

Queens were also more likely to wage war than kings in medieval Europe, dispelling the idea that female rule automatically leads to peace.

Now, obviously women shouldn't be barred or discriminated against if they try to become politicians or CEOs.

Still, just having more female CEOs or more female politicians isn't the solution.

I agree with the idea that the feminine is needed to heal society -- but what's needed isn't more female CEOs. What's needed is more women who love fearlessly and unconditionally and universally, and who express that openly. That, in turn, empowers men to want to take care of everyone.

In fact, people are so female-love-starved that many people in society have begun accepting bad proposals that are obviously unbalanced in the direction of being excessively feminine-energy (excessively caretaking of perceived vulnerable people) and insufficiently masculine-energy (insufficiently practical and logical). 

Examples of this are unrestricted illegal immigration, enforced covid lockdowns, preferential hiring of so-called vulnerable groups, and censoring and arresting people who say things that hurt the feelings of so-called vulnerable groups.

Yes, many of these things were implemented by men, but that's the point -- they were implemented by men who weren't nourished by female love. 

Men who don't get enough female love may actually lack masculinity, and may become excessively preoccupied with getting approval from women. This is what you're seeing in Western men. 

The colder and harsher that women are towards men, the less masculine that men become -- except for a few narcissistic men who don't care about anything other than their own success and pleasure, or even a few psychopathic men who have decided that they want to set the world on fire.

If men aren't masculine, then that ultimately hurts both men and women.

So, how to fix this situation?

Well, either men need to be the ones to first move towards protecting and providing for people, or women need to be the ones to first move towards loving everyone and expressing that.

Because I'm a man myself, I'll address this from the perspective of: how can men help in this situation? 

Well, any man can contribute a little bit and be a part of the solution. You don't need to fix the world by yourself. I'm sure you can think of some way to contribute a little bit towards making your community safer and more prosperous.

I think this kind of local initiatives are usually more productive than engaging in national politics, except for those rare individuals who are genuinely called to be politicians.

At some point you might get actual leaders in office. However so far, national politics in the US is mostly a gender war by proxy.

The political left is mostly feminine-energy-aligned (taking care of people and nature, sometimes more of a focus on policies that emotionally feel good rather than policies that intellectually make sense). And indeed, most women vote left. Although this is changing because the mainstream US political left is becoming quite unhinged nowadays.

Meanwhile the political right is mostly masculine-energy-aligned (material abundance through economic growth, safety through closed borders and a strong military). And indeed, most men vote right.

And at least in the US, the fight between the feminine left and the masculine right is more bitter than ever. This hints that the sexes are fighting more bitterly than ever. 

And whether the masculine-energy-aligned party beats the feminine-energy-aligned party or the other way around, I don't think either will actually heal society. Maybe this new Trump will be amazing, but it's also entirely possible that he will be pretty good but not transformative, like the original Trump was.

In fact, the whole idea of political competition between the sexes, through the proxy of political parties, is sort of strange. 

Roughly speaking if you governed the USA with Pleiadian form of decision-making, then you wouldn't have a metaphorical fight to the death every four years about whether the feminine-energy-aligned party or the masculine-energy-aligned party gets to implement feminine- or masculine-energy-aligned policy.

Immigration policy wouldn't be set by the party or president who happened to be in power. Instead, you'd have a binding referendum that would set immigration policy for a certain number of years. And everyone would be invited to vote, with votes from higher-consciousness people having more weight.

If men collectively said: "in order to make sure everyone in our society is protected and provided for, we need to put a stop to illegal immigration" then most female Pleiadians would either vote for that because that's what men said, or if they disagreed or weren't sure they might simply not vote. Why? Because female Pleiadians trust male Pleiadians to protect and provide for them, and that also means that female Pleiadians listen to what men say is necessary to keep everyone protected and provided for.

Of course, this isn't female Pleiadians being subservient to men, this is just about female Pleiadians trusting men to take care of their domain, and giving them the authority to do so. 

Spirituality is seen as more of a female domain, so when there is a referendum about a spiritual topic and female Pleiadians collectively express a strong preference, then your average practical-minded, physically-oriented male Pleiadian may vote along female lines or may not vote at all, trusting female Pleiadians to advocate for the right thing there. After all, male Pleiadians also trust female Pleiadians, just like female Pleiadians trust male Pleiadians.

For example, way back there were a series of referendums that boiled down to: should we help the people of Earth, and in what way? And during those referendums, female Pleiadians as a group strongly advocated for helping the people of Earth. Now even among male Pleiadians there already was a majority for helping Earth. Still, some male Pleiadians who were leaning towards voting not to help you, either voted to help you or chose not to vote at all, because they knew that female Pleiadians were spiritually wiser than they were and that's what female Pleiadians advocated for. So those male Pleiadians trusted the judgement of female Pleiadians on a topic that we would see as spiritual and more female-aligned.

I understand that you're not there yet. At the same time, it would be great if the men and women of Earth could start trusting each other and start working together again.

Currently, men and women in your society aren't really working together. They're mostly just working in their own personal interests and in the interests of their family. Now, for those individuals who happen to have a great relationship and a great family, this works decently well, but obviously not everyone does. So it would be better if men would see it as part of their responsibility to also protect and provide for their community, and if women would see it as part of their responsibility to love everyone and express that. Yes, I know that your society tells you that you don't owe other people anything, but well, that's why your society sucks.

I invite you to try something different instead.

I hope you found this helpful.

Your star brother,

A. S. 

For Era of Light

These channelings are exclusively submitted to Eraoflight.com by the channeler. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to the original post.

If you are interested in local meetings with other people also seeking first contact with benevolent ETs, then please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/ . If you search with control-F for @, then you can quickly find email addresses of those who are organizing local groups. It’s also not too late to post a new (secondary) email address yourself to start a new local group, because we plan to keep linking to that post for the foreseeable future.

---

 

Compiled by http://violetflame.biz.ly from: 

• channelings@substack.com

 

Archives:

• A. S.,   R’Kok,   search,   meaning,   
• lev,   quantum transition,   
• 3d 4d 5d,   betrayal,   christs creation,   co-creators,   dark and gray races,   karma, malice,   pleroma,    collaboration,    higher self,    blueprint,    new earth, operation adonai,  R’Kok,